from nodebpy import geometry as gNode API Design
The design approach for interfacing with the nodes takes several aspects into consideration.
Sockets
Inputs
Input sockets are exposed in two different ways, they are positional arguments in the class __init__ signature and are available behind the inputs / i accessor on the nodes.
class SetPosition(BaseNode):
def __init__(
self,
geometry: InputGeometry = None,
selection: InputBoolean = True,
position: InputVector = None,
offset: InputVector = (0.0, 0.0, 0.0),
):We can either pass in nodes / sockets / values into the constructor, or link them after construction.
The g.Cube() is used as a positional argument to geometry, while we explicitly state the offset with a keyword argument. On the second line we scale Position() by 0.5 and then link that to the position input of SetPosition.
with g.tree() as tree:
sp = g.SetPosition(g.Cube(), offset=g.RandomValue() * 0.1)
_ = (g.Position() * 0.5) >> sp.i.position
treeOutputs
Selection of outputs is done automatically to best match the data types of the inputs. You can be specific with the output though, with outputs available behind the outputs / o accessor.
with g.tree() as tree:
time = g.SceneTime()
_ = (
g.Cube()
>> g.SetPosition(offset=g.RandomValue(min=-1) * time.o.seconds)
>> tree.outputs.geometry()
)
treeSlicing Inputs and Outputs
You can use slicing to access individual or multiple components of input and output sockets.
with g.tree() as tree:
sep = g.SeparateXYZ(g.Position())
comb = g.CombineXYZ(*sep.o)
comb2 = g.CombineXYZ()
sep.o[1] >> comb2.i[2]
treeWe can replicate part of a PCA analysis, getting the mean difference of the position field, scaling and combining into a matrix.
with g.tree() as tree:
pos = g.Position()
diff = g.FieldAverage.point.vector(pos).o.mean - pos
matrix = g.CombineMatrix()
for i, axis1 in enumerate(diff):
sep = g.FieldAverage.point.vector(diff * axis1)
for j, axis2 in enumerate(sep.o.mean):
axis2 >> matrix.i[int(i * 4 + j)]
treeVector Outputs
Some output attributes have convenience methods for simpler chaining. Vector outputs can access the x/y/z/ components quickly, which internally adds the SeparateXYZ required. The same SeparateXYZ node is re-used across different outputs.
with g.tree() as tree:
pos = g.Position().o.position
_ = g.SetPosition(g.Cube(), position=pos.x, offset=pos.y)
treeOther Accessors
Similar methods also exist for SocketColor, SocketMatrix
Matrix
Matrix sockets have access to the translation, rotation and scale from the transform.
with g.tree() as tree:
mat = g.CombineMatrix().o.matrix
mat.translation * 0.5
mat.rotation >> g.RotateRotation()
mat.scale + 0.5
treeColor
Color sockets have r g b a properties.
with g.tree() as tree:
col = g.CombineColor().o.color
col.r + 10
col.g + 0.5
col.b * 0.3
col.a - 0.3
treeEnum Options
Many options aren’t available as sockets. These are exposed on the node class itself. The non-socket options are always keyword arguments, requiring them to be explicitly stated.
class EvaluateAtIndex(BaseNode):
def __init__(
self,
value: InputFloat
| InputInteger
| InputBoolean
| InputVector
| InputRotation
| InputMatrix = None,
index: InputInteger = 0,
*,
domain: _AttributeDomains = "POINT",
data_type: _EvaluateAtIndexDataTypes = "FLOAT",
):They are set during the class construction, but can also be set and changed afterwards.
with g.tree() as tree:
eai = g.EvaluateAtIndex(data_type="FLOAT_VECTOR")
eai.data_type = "QUATERNION"
eai.domain = "FACE"Class Methods
For nodes that have mode, domain, data_type and operation as potential enum values, convenience class methods are provided.
The order that these methods will appear are:
mode>domain>data_type>operation, but should only ever be 1 or 2 deep.g.EvaluateAtIndex.face.vector() # .domain.data_type g.Compare.float.less_than() # .data_type.operation
Because sockets are the only positional for the node constructors, enum values like data_typa have to be specified with as key word arguments to the constructor. All enum options are type-hinted with Literal[] so IDE auto-complete and type hinting will work, but the convenience class methods enable a cleaner way of writing the nodes. For the example below both methods do work, but the second is cleaner to write and flows better with what the node is doing; ‘On the edge domain, evaluate a float attribute’.
with g.tree():
# domain and data_type require kwargs
eod1 = g.EvaluateOnDomain(domain="EDGE", data_type="FLOAT")
# better IDE type-hinting and auto-complete
eod2 = g.EvaluateOnDomain.edge.float()
assert eod1.data_type == eod2.data_type
assert eod1.domain == eod2.domainA similar approach is taken for the Compare node, with the first being data type and then secondarily the comparison operation.
If the items being compared are nodes or sockets, regular boolean comparison with operators will also work. All 3 different approaches have the same result.
a = g.Integer(0)
b = g.Integer(2)
g.Compare(A_INT = a, A_INT = b, data_type = "INT", operation="EQUAL")
g.Compare.integer.equal(a, b)
a == bComparing Node Objects
In this instance comp will be a g.Compare node, set with the operation="GREATER_THAN" and data_type="INT".
As this is a node within the node graph, the inputs have the potential to change during node tree evaluation meaning the result of the comparison could change. During playback on an animation the output will be Cube at frames <=50 and Cone when above that value.
with g.tree():
a = g.SceneTime().o.frame
b = g.Integer(50)
comp = a > b
geo = g.Switch.geometry(comp, g.Cube(), g.Cone())
comp<nodebpy.builder.socket.BooleanSocket at 0x13c1dcad0>
Comparing Python Objects
If the comparison was of just regular python values, then the result at runtime will just be boolean True and not a Compare node. This means the value won’t change during node tree evaluation, and will only be evaluated a single time in node tree construction.
The result below will always output a Cone geoemtry because the input will always be True.
with g.tree():
a = 0
b = 0
comp = a == b
geo = g.Switch.geometry(comp, g.Cube(), g.Cone())
compTrue